The Sexual Liberation and it's consequences have been a disaster for society.

Masquerade

Recruit
★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2024
Posts
160
Almost everything wrong with society can be traced back to the sexual liberation aka being a whore becoming more acceptable in our society, It all starts with the degradation of marriage which in turn caused the degradation of the nuclear family.
NYPICHPDPICT000010097670

The evidence shows there is an undeniable link between having more premarital sexual partners and not being able to hold together a marriage, Even having one partner before getting married can decrease your odds by 15%, This was a study done back in 2016, god knows how bad it is now considering you can see a trend upward for divorce rate except for those who had 0 partners. Why does this matter? well.

Figure4new w640


Children whose parents are divorced are more likely to not graduate from college which means they are more likely to not have obtained a high salary career and they are more likely to be criminals, This even effects young foids aswell.

9f3ae4e1 chart2 depression vs divorce rate 1 419418191

There is a positive correlation with higher divorces rates and higher depression rates across all US cities, one can make the fair assumption that a lot of this depression comes from the kids of those who are divorced.

Turns out the consequences of letting women act like whores are very bad, who could of guessed that. Not normoids of course. Society is in a literal decay and it's literally the fault of whores. More and more people find themselves depressed and alone, isolated from the world. More and more people are becoming incels and it all stems from the fact we decided as a society to stop shaming women for turning themselves into sex objects for chad :feelsclown:.
 
Last edited:
High IQ post. You could have posted this on Reddit. But you’ll probably be denounced as “incel” and have your post flagged and removed, even while all this is meant to be concrete data on the dynamic of real-world relationships. I’ve seen Redditors openly denounce the connection between the stability of LTR’s and the bodycount of the male/female partner as “junk science” or “undertones of misogynistic beliefs”

At the end of the day, whether we like it or not, research data is the closest point of reference we have to the situation in real world. Bluepillers might say the data is misleading, and there are other factors which contribute to divorce and incarceration besides “bodycount” or “single-parenthood”. This is a fair counter-suggestion. But, for the connection between divorce rates and bodycount, the statistics are consistent. The more previous sex/romantic partners, the higher the odds of breakup or divorce. Based on the available data, this is a brute fact. If a man cares about a woman’s bodycount when in pursuit of LTR, it’s not “misogynistic”, it’s not “incel-ish”, it’s not a sign of “insecurity”, it’s not “bad vibes” --- It is a purely rational concern, based on consistent patterns in available data on divorce rates and bodycount prior to divorce

It doesn’t necessarily mean all women with high BC will divorce or cheat in LTR. There may be women out there with high BCs who will remain faithful. But these women are usually not as likely to remain faithful, as shown by the data. The odds of finding a woman with high BC who'll remain faithful and not divorce-rape in LTR is not zero, but the odds are evidently lower in contrast to women with low BCs. For any man who's in search of a LTR partner, it is inferentially recommended (by the data) that women with a high number of previous sex partners should be avoided if possible
 
Last edited:
High IQ post. You could have posted this on Reddit. But you’ll probably be denounced as “incel” and have your post flagged and removed, even while all this is meant to be concrete data on the dynamic of real-world relationships. I’ve seen Redditors openly denounce the connection between the stability of LTR’s and the bodycount of the male/female partner as “junk science” or “undertones of misogynistic beliefs”
Reddit is such a fucking joke, you literally can't say or express anything that doesn't fit with those faggots' worldview. I used to be an r/foreveralone user but I got tired of constantly having to shut up blackpilled stuff and I find some of the fa women absurd. Unless a woman is severely deformed she will have suitors.
 
I've been saying this for a while too, call me :bluepill: but the only genuinely healthy marriages I've seen were in my church.10, 20 even 50+ years being together. Guy is happy and the woman isn't an atrocious whore. I believe the normalization of premarital sex and multiple sex partners before marriage really ruined our society.

Women and men are not built for polygamous fucking like animals we've had marriage since the start of our civilization if you look at the evidence. Take a look at history, premarital sex was never normalized except very rarely in some small human tribes. Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Asia all had some concept of marriage and punishment for fornication by men and especially women they understood something these redditors' brains can't wrap their soy-filled heads around.

Mankind was never meant for senseless fornication, the unhappiness in modern relationships and the collapse of the nuclear family is a scourge by Satan himself. Anyone who spreads the promiscuity narrative saying it's better for you is the devil in disguise.
 
Also I find it hilarious how the boomers who normalized promiscuity in the 60s thought their subhuman traits would give them endless poon with all women. As soon as women were free to fuck whoever they want they slowly started to become more and more chad only over time as social media and television was invented. Fucking boomers.
 
Unhappiness and small tribes are natural. Monogamy is like a bio-hack that enabled society to progress technologically. That's why we need Marxism-Rodgerism
 
Incorrect. Imperfect.
Monogamy is good, but not natural. I still support monogamy because I don't give in to the naturalistic fallacy.
 


Write your reply...

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top